|
|
|
Disruption at major maritime chokepoints is no longer an exceptional event. Armed conflict, attacks on commercial vessels, sanctions, congestion and climate-related restrictions increasingly require businesses to choose between continuing through a higher-risk area, accepting a longer route or changing the mode of transport.
Each option carries legal consequences. Continuing on the original route may affect insurance coverage and incur additional premiums. Rerouting may increase freight and delay while introducing new ports, transshipment points and sanctions exposure. Moving cargo from sea to air may alter the applicable liability regime, contractual delivery terms and customs valuation.
|
| 1. The Contract Determines Who Bears the Risk of Rerouting |
| 2. Neither Force Majeure nor Insurance Protection Is Automatic |
| 3. Rerouting May Create New Korean Compliance Risks |
| 4. Practical Takeaways for Foreign Businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| View Web |
|
|
| Please click subscribe if you wish to receive our Newsletters. |