Under the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act (“DRBA”), a rehabilitation creditor’s claim is generally extinguished if the creditor fails to report the claim within the prescribed reporting period and the court subsequently authorizes the rehabilitation plan.  This forfeiture rule serves the important objective of bringing certainty to the debtor’s legal relationships and facilitating the efficient implementation of the confirmed rehabilitation plan.

A recent decision of the Supreme Court, however, has recognized a significant exception to this principle.  In Supreme Court Decision No. 2025Da217253 (decided February 12, 2026), the Court held that an unreported rehabilitation claim is not forfeited where the creditor was unaware of the rehabilitation proceedings and therefore unable to report the claim, while the custodian knew, or could readily have known, of the existence of the claim but nevertheless failed to include it in the list of rehabilitation claims.

This article examines the forfeiture of rehabilitation claims under the DRBA, the exception established by the Supreme Court, and the practical implications of the decision for creditors.

26F, Grand Central A, 14 Sejong-daero, Jung-gu, Seoul T. +82-2-6200-1600 E. master@jipyong.com

Subscribe | Unsubscribe

Seoul | Suncheon | Busan | Shanghai | Ho Chi Minh City | Hanoi | Jakarta | Phnom Penh | Vientiane | Yangon | Moscow | Budapest

This message was prepared for our clients for the purpose of providing real-time updates on general legal information only, and should not be relied on as legal advice or the opinion of the firm. Please contact the relevant authors for further information regarding an article's contents.

ⓒ JIPYONG LLC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.